I'm reading the chapter written by Lee Howser and Carole Schwinn of Jackson Community College in Michigan, and I like the tone so far. Howser, the new president, has a self-deprecating wit and has successfully carried his "boiling frog" analogy through the chapter. In other words, when taking over the college, he realized he didn't have the sense to jump out of the pot; the temperature just kept getting hotter. In his quest to remake the college, which ultimately was successful, Howser introduces the idea of interactive design. The process, he says, begins with "'formulation of the mess,' or an understanding of the set of interacting problems" faced by the college (p. 129). I love the mess imagery. Although Jackson could have stood on its laurels for quite some time, it didn't. Instead, the college looked critically at the challenges facing it and discovered:
- Faculty and staff were aging. Who was going to take over?
- Equipment was aging. Some was 30 years old.
- Curriculum was not being updated.
- Enrollment was dropping.
- The area was losing jobs.
- Employee morale was decreasing.
This no-holds-barred approach helped Jackson reinvent itself from the ground up. Have you ever been involved with an organization that went through a similar "formulation of the mess" process? If so, how did it go? What was the result?
I guess I could say I'm in that a bit with the program I just took over. I just haven't started formulating the mess quite yet... But I think that's what I'll need to do. Take stock of what's not working (primary employer isn't hiring, limited job sources at present, older equipment, insufficient advising access, etc.). And then do some "reinventing" and re-envisioning.
ReplyDeleteNever been have been through a process like that, but I find that to be very interesting. I think at some point the whole "mess" thing is needed. It would open eyes on every level of the college.
ReplyDelete